New Delhi:
The biggest rivalry: India vs PakistanA three -episodes documentary series in Netflix examines one of the most intense and historical rivalries in modern sport, but not only imposes you.
It does not simply focus on the spectacle of the Cricket matches, but places the sport within the broader sociopolitical context of India and Pakistan, where each party between the two is loaded with the weight of history, national pride and the decades of political tension.
The series is anchored in two key tours, Pakistan’s tour of India in 1999 and the Indian tour of Pakistan in 2004, but its reach extends beyond these two events, which offers a rich but sometimes unequal representation of the Cricket contest that has come to symbolize the complex relationship between the two nations.
The series is driven by the ideas of the great Cricket that defined this rivalry: Virender Sehwag, Souv Ganguly, Shoaib Akhtar, Inzamam-Ul-Haq, Wasim Akram, R. Ashwin, Shikhar Dhawan and others. Their reflections on these iconic parties are fundamental for narration.
These interviews offer a vision without ornaments of what it meant to be part of such a high game, where the intensity of the sport was often bordered by the nationalist fervor that surrounded it.
Sehwag, for example, recalls the mental tension of facing Shoaib Akhtar in 2004, stating that playing against Akhtar was like “facing a monster”, and that psychological toll was immense. He also mentioned that he consulted psychologists to deal with pressure and illustrated the mental challenges faced by players at the upper level.
He also remembers his time in Pakistan, sharing funny anecdotes about buying numerous costumes for his family, a gesture of hospitality that Pakistan extended to his Indian counterparts despite the tension in the air.
Souv Ganguly, with its characteristic style, encapsulates the spirit of these meetings, remembering the 2004 Pakistan tour with love and humor. He jokes, “Voh Didh Mahina Diwali Tha” (those 1.5 months felt like a festival), giving the spectators a vision of the camaraderie that developed in the middle of the fierce competition.
However, although the documentary manages to humanize the players and capture the emotional intensity of the matches, the amplitude of the rivalry between India-Pakistan cannot often explore.
The approach is placed unexpectedly on the 2004 tour, with little attention to other important meetings, especially the World Cup matches, which have been fundamental moments in the history of this rivalry.
In particular, Sachin’s omission of the documentary feels like a lost opportunity. The role of Tendulkar is not even mentioned in the 2004 fine test, where he obtained 194 **. Although Sehwag’s triple century is celebrated correctly, the exclusion of Tendulkar entrances, which was only six runs of a double one hundred when the Indian team declared, is an obvious supervision.
Another remarkable absence is Rahul Dravid, the captain during that 2004 tour. While many other voices in the world of Crick, such as Sunil Gavaskar, Waqar Younis and Javed Mity, are heard throughout the series, the perspective of Rahul Dravid Missing notably. This limited scope lets the documentary feel something one -dimensional, since it excludes voices that would have enriched the narrative.
The strength of the documentary lies in its ability to convey the greatest nature than the life of India-Pakistan parties. As Shikhar Dhawan summarizes rightly, these games are “nothing less than a war”, and bets could not be higher.
The political backdrop of these games, against the history of the partition, kargil and the continuous diplomatic tensions, imbues each ball played and each race scored with an importance that goes far beyond sport.
The documentary touches the potential that Cricket acts as a diplomatic tool and offers a brief but important vision of how sport has served as a bridge between these two nations in times of crisis. Goodwill promoted during the 2004 series, especially after years of detainees, shows the power of sport to transcend the animosity, even if it is only temporarily.
However, although the documentary presents convincing moments, it occasionally deviates towards sensationalism. Some of the recreations and the excessive use of the Photoshopped newspaper cuts subtract from the narration of solid stories. The inclusion of these elements feels like an attempt to fill the narrative instead of offering a substantive vision.
In addition, the series is often rushed through important moments, particularly the broader historical and political context. It could have benefited from more time dedicated to exploring the evolution of rivalry, including the quarterfinals of the 1996 World Cup and tense meetings in later years.
The rhythm of the series is another area where it falls short. With only three episodes, each of about 30 minutes, the series compresses a vast and rich story within a relatively small term. As a result, the key events are overlooked, and the documentary lacks the depth required to completely appreciate the magnitude of the rivalry.
The decision to focus mainly on the 2004 series, although significant, means that the documentary is lost to cover a broader range of crucial matches and moments that have defined this lasting rivalry.
That said, the best rivalry: India vs Pakistan is a clock that is worthwhile for Cricket fans and those interested in understanding the sociopolitical impact of sport.
Ultimately, the documentary shines in moments of personal reflection and when he deepens the life of Crickets. It is a fascinating look at the Indian-Pakistan Cricket, but that could have benefited from a more expansive vision and a less hurried rhythm.
By
