An overview of the Supreme Court. | Photo credit: Shashi Shekhar Kashyap
The Supreme Court on Thursday (February 6, 2025) transferred requests that challenge the results of the Consutarian Law Admission (CLAT) 2025, waiting for several superior courts, to a division division bank of the Superior Court of Delhi.
The Supreme Court ordered the list of the results of the challenging exams of all pleasures before the Bank of the Delhi Division on March 3.
The Supreme Court also asked all superior courts where they are pending the requests against the exam results to send them to Delhi HC within 7 days.
The CLAT 2025, held on December 1, 2024, determines admissions to undergraduate law courses in universities of national law in the country and presented themselves in different superior courts claiming that several questions on the exam were wrong.
Previously, on January 15, a Bank of the Supreme Court comprised of the President of the Supreme Court of India, Sanjiv Khanna, and Judge Sanjay Kumar issued notices on transfer requests presented by the Consortium of Universities of National Law (CNLU) , seeking to consolidate multiple pending cases in the high courts.
On December 20, 2024, a single judge of the Superior Court of Delhi ordered the consortium to review the CLAT-2025 result on errors in the response key. The verdict of the single judge, which arose in the plea of a CLAT applicant, ruled the answers to two questions in the entry test was incorrect. The plea had challenged the answers key published by the Consortium on December 7, 2024 while looking for an address to declare the correct answers to certain questions. The single judge said the errors were “demonstrably clear” and that “closing a fat eye with them” would be equivalent to injustice. While the applicant challenged the order of the Judge who rejected his prayer on the other two questions, the consortium moved against the decision of the single judge.
On December 24, 2024, a division bank that listens to the challenges refused to approve any provisional order after Prima Facie did not find any error with the order of the single judge about both questions and said that the consortium was free to declare The results in terms of the judge’s decision.
(With PTI inputs)
Published – February 6, 2025 11:19 am ist
By
