The growing housing insurance crisis is in the center of attention when the Californians begin the long road to reconstruction after the mortal forest fires of Eaton and Palisades.
For neighbors Louise Hamlin and Chris Wilson, the difference in insurance coverage in their almost identical homes in Altadena reveals how unequal that recovery will be.
Hamlin was secured privately and almost a million dollars have already been paid. She is looking for contractors to rebuild her home.
Wilson will receive a fraction of what he needs because he was covered by the just access plan for California insurance requirements: the state bone insurance program known as the fair plan. He is contemplating loans, demands and taking his family from California.
The plan is a temporary coverage option created by the State as a last resort for owners who cannot find private insurance. More Californians trust him than ever after several important insurance companies, either leisurely or restricted new businesses in the state in recent years.
In the case of Wilson, his private insurer refused to renew his policy last year, although he offered to install several fire mitigation efforts. No other insurer was willing to write a new policy, which forced Wilson to carry out the fair plan to meet his mortgage requirements.
The number of fair residential policies issued in the State doubled between 2020 and 2024, reaching almost 452,000 policies.
According to the fair plan, Wilson paid approximately 60% more on premiums related to the fire that Hamlin, although it is scheduled to receive less than half of the coverage. And his true home insurance cost was actually much higher because he also had to buy “insurance envelope” for problems that the fair plan does not cover, such as burst or objects that fall.
The Insurance Information Institute, which represents many important insurers, said the fair plan provides a life line for housing owners who cannot find private insurance, and that the results would be much worse if the owners did not have any coverage.
State officials have launched several new regulations to give insurers more freedom to increase premiums in exchange for issuing more policies in high -risk areas. That includes allowing insurers Consider climate change By establishing their prices and allowing them to transmit reinsurance costs to California consumers.
Governments also have to assume the costs of serious mitigation efforts, or the California fire risk price will continue to be unequal and leave the home owners, said Stephen Collier, a professor of urban planning at the University of California, Berkeley. California proposes to direct approximately $ 25 million of a climate bonus approved by voters to reinforce fire mitigation requirements around homes.
By
